Author Archive

Online samples – where lighting a few fires might help

flame on a struck matchIn Greek mythology, it was Prometheus who stole the secret of fire from Zeus and gave it to humankind. The new non-profit organisation being launched by rival research giants GfK and Kantar to address industry-wide concerns about the online survey quality, seems to make a nod to the myth in its chosen name, the Promedius Group.

The industry’s concerns about online research are many and various, but a common complaint is the lack of transparency of sample providers in the composition of their samples and the extent to which these overlap. It’s worrying enough that, as response rates dwindle, research firms are probably already relying on less than 20% of the population to answer more than 80% of their surveys. But what if it is the hyperactive 0.1% of the population that turn out to be answering 10%, or 20%, as some fear, turning survey data into junk? Without the vantage point of the gods, no-one can really tell what is happening.

Good research is always a balance of art, craft and science. The risk is that if survey results are no longer generally reproduceable, any claims to scientific validity are lost. Those that spend the big money in research, like General Mills and P&G, have noticed this, and are highly likely to start putting their money in consumer intelligence gathering elsewhere unless research can be made more accountable again.

The solution is staring at us from the problem. There is a vast trail of data that can be associated with every web-based interaction – put it all together and it becomes possible to pinpoint individuals and identify, within reasonable probabilities, that they do seem to be taking 20 surveys a day, or that they are very unlikely to be a gynaecologist because the digital wake emanating from the same PC speaks more of college student. Getting at this data, however, is much more difficult. If you are a big player, with a large volume of interactions, you can do this – but even the industry’s own demi-gods face a major hindrance, in that most of the panel providers don’t reveal the key information you need to start putting this information together, like respondent IDs or IP addresses.

Promedius will, it appears, be making use of a lot of technology to match data and perform checks on data, and they will be making this technology available for other research companies to use. This is welcome news, as the problem has been proving too big for anyone to solve on their own. There are already commercial services – MarketTools’ Truesample and Peanut Lab’s Optimus to name two – and these have gained some traction. They also add cost, and are restricted to some extent by only ever showing part of the picture – from those samples and providers that have opted in.

With three major players backing this initiative (IPSOS were involved in the development of the technology behind Promedius) it is likely that it will have the critical mass that is needed for it to become established. What the technology does, and how affordable and convenient that is (the announcements do not say that this will be offered to the industry for free) remains to be seen. I’ll be looking to secure a software review as soon as it becomes available. But there is a good chance that Promedius will be putting fire into the hands of the people, as far as panel and online survey transparency is concerned.

Hopefully Promedius will enjoy a better fate than its near namesake, who after several other skirmishes, found himself bound to a rock by the vengeful Zeus, with an eagle visiting him every day into eternity to peck away his liver.

Her Majesty’s Cross-tabs

Benjamin Rietti, MD of E-Tabs (centre right) after receiving the Queen's Award for Innovation from Martin Russell, Deputy Lord Lieutenant of London (right) in the presence of Cllr Lisa Rutter, Deputy Mayor of the London Borough of Barnet (centre left) and her consort.

I suspect market research is not often mentioned at Buckingham Palace. So it was pleasing to be summoned to the presence of the Queen’s representative in London, the Deputy Lord Lieutenant, to a bit of modest pomp at a business part in North London, on the cleared carpet-tiled floor of  E-Tabs Ltd. We were here to witness a little bit of MR software history being made. This MR software developer  has just won the Queen’s Award for Innovation. It’s an award in one of three categories among the annual Queen’s Awards for Enterprise: essentially honours for firms, and an award not easily come by.

As the DLL said “this year there was a total of 414 applications nationally for the Innovation category, of which only 38 were awarded.” In fact, just three other firms in London received the 2010 Innovation award, making this quite an achievement, as E-Tabs was competing against every imaginable industry sector.

Clearly, more than one thing turned the judges’ heads in E-Tabs. The Sovereign’s representative was not that specific. As with the honours list, we never get to learn what really clinched it, but he mentioned sustained development since the first E-Tabs browser emerged in 1993 (then the ITE Electronic Fiche) and the product’s contribution to ‘significant improvement in business performance and commercial success’ and also the extent to which E-Tabs had probably saved a few forests ‘through the paper you save your clients’. I’d add to that the extent to which these guys get it about what matters in market research at the delivery end.

While others have been building palaces at the data collection end, E-Tabs has focused on finding better ways to create and publish research data, and in an admirably democratic way. They don’t dictate how you collect your data or what platform you use to process it. They are masters of collaboration and rigorously agnostic about data formats. They have gone from one product for reading static reports to a whole family of products to publish reports, churn out PowerPoints or create web portals. Their latest offering – and boy do we need this – software for automatically checking tables and detecting inconsistencies through a number of probability-based deduction methods.

So, hats off to E-Tabs! Congratulations on an award deservedly won. But don’t let it go to your heads, guys,  there’s still room for more inspiration on the results delivery side of our industry, and that innovation needs to continue to flow.

How will iPad affect research?

An Apple iPad on a desk

Apple's carrying case for the iPad also acts as a handy desk stand, when flipped open.

Apple’s new IPad launched in the UK yesterday and one has happened to find it’s way into my hands pretty early in the day – in the interests of research, of course. It is a truly impressive device every bit as iconoclastic as the iPhone and possibly more so. iPhone could always be seen as a next generation smartphone delivered with Apple’s customary flair for designing what everyone else was trying to design – but didn’t.

With iPad they have come up with something no-one was even thinking about. It isn’t really like anything else and this explains some of the criticism and nay-saying there has been about it. E.g “Kindle does a better job at being a e-book reader”, “If you want to do any serious work, you’re better off with a tablet PC”, “do we really need another device alongside the desktop, the laptop rand the smartphone?”

If I were to sum up what it is, it is a personal device for using the Internet, free from the overhead and constraints of using a personal computer. It is a content consumption tool with some exceedingly convenient capabilities for interacting and responding too.

iPad is superb at displaying web pages – not in any way restricted for size, as many assume due to it’s paperback book-sized dimensions. In fact, full-size 1024 pixel wide pages are crystal clear and readable. I was relieved to see all the text on our own website and on others, like the Research Live site are legible without any zooming in required. The sound is good and rich without resorting to earphones and video is astonishing: is on a par with HDTV.

The on-screen keyboard has come in for criticism, but it really isn’t a bad way of entering text. Maybe not for writing a report but for email, entering searches, filling in forms for online shopping and the like it is entirely up to the job. It helps if you are used to the soft keyboard on iPhone as it is simply a bigger version of that. This blog entry, to prove the point, comes to you from an iPad. Did it take longer to write? Yes and no. If I had used my laptop it would have been written faster. But probably not until Monday. It is the convenience, the do-it-nowability of iPad which is it’s strength.

an Apple iPad displaying a website outdoors

iPad displays content-rich websites with astonishing clarity, given its modest screen size.

It is heavier than some might like but the metal case and glass screen actually give it resilience and a quality feel. It would make an extremely convenient tool for face-to-face interviewing. Much more portable then a tablet and not pinched for size like a PDA. A whole day’s interviewing on a single battery charge. Where a wireless network is available or cellular G3 coverage, surveys could be set up and run using any unmodified web survey tool, provided it did not use flash. I am sure we will see some extensions to existing CAPI products to provide specific support for iPad which would then allow interviewing to be done off-line too. The quality of the multimedia support means there would be no reservations or technical hangups to showing TV quality stimulus materials for ad testing, for example.

IPad will be the must-have device for 2010 I have no doubt. According to some new research from Intersperience, online consumers do see a need for getting one, and there could be 7 million of them in the UK in 5 years time. That means it is inevitable that people will be taking surveys on iPads.

All the more important then that researchers consider where and how their surveys are going to be “consumed”, and shed a few assumptions of the past. Prime among these must be to ensure the survey experience delivered to the participant does not jolt them back a couple of decades from the rich, colourful and conversational world of the Internet today to one more like an exam paper on screen. What iPad does is raise the stakes in survey design.